That’s confusing cause and effect. Howard Dean’s speech was supposed to be a concession speech after losing the only early primary/caucus he was trying to win. He poured in all of his resources in the hopes of winning Iowa, underperformed expectations against a backdrop of dropping in the polls for weeks, and coming in third (with no real prospects for New Hampshire or South Carolina) basically made it impossible for him to have the volunteers, money, or press coverage to survive into the next stage of competing in bigger states with primaries clumped up together.
He showed everyone his plan of winning Iowa or going home, lost Iowa, and then gave some kind of rallying speech as if he had a plan to recover from that loss. He never did, and it wasn’t the scream that killed his campaign. His campaign was dead before the scream happened. It’s just that the scream was a particularly memorable way for a campaign to die.
The media still haven’t realized that they’re a bunch of highly educated puppies. They write well and can form a compelling story, but at the end of the day they get distracted by, and tend to focus on, any flashy or squeaky object in their periphery.
Back when the internet was fun, there was a flash game where you could play as the different presidential nominees, and Howard Dean’s special move was the “Dean Scream” where he would scream flipping back and forth from left to right, and all the enemies on screen would fall down. Top tier.
Howard Dean said “yeaaahh!” strangely that one time and that was it for him. It doesn’t take much.
That’s confusing cause and effect. Howard Dean’s speech was supposed to be a concession speech after losing the only early primary/caucus he was trying to win. He poured in all of his resources in the hopes of winning Iowa, underperformed expectations against a backdrop of dropping in the polls for weeks, and coming in third (with no real prospects for New Hampshire or South Carolina) basically made it impossible for him to have the volunteers, money, or press coverage to survive into the next stage of competing in bigger states with primaries clumped up together.
He showed everyone his plan of winning Iowa or going home, lost Iowa, and then gave some kind of rallying speech as if he had a plan to recover from that loss. He never did, and it wasn’t the scream that killed his campaign. His campaign was dead before the scream happened. It’s just that the scream was a particularly memorable way for a campaign to die.
Big pet peeve of mine when people attribute his decline to the Dean Scream. The scream was the final nail in the coffin.
Yeah, but y’see - that’s way less funny
Because our media is shit
Biden really was visibly too old. But they’re also pretty good at ginning up issues literally out of nothing when they want to.
The media still haven’t realized that they’re a bunch of highly educated puppies. They write well and can form a compelling story, but at the end of the day they get distracted by, and tend to focus on, any flashy or squeaky object in their periphery.
Pretty sure you’re talking about two different groups of people inside “the media” there.
Don’t forget that we voted for Bush because people would rather have a beer in their back yard with him than with Kerry.
people didn’t like that scream?
That’s a pretty rad scream.
EEeeYEAH-HyeeuuUH!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwkNnMrsx7Q?t=50
Back when the internet was fun, there was a flash game where you could play as the different presidential nominees, and Howard Dean’s special move was the “Dean Scream” where he would scream flipping back and forth from left to right, and all the enemies on screen would fall down. Top tier.
There’s a lot of fragile people out there who can’t handle things like rad screams, dijon mustard, or women’s right to self-determination.
but that’s the trifecta…
oh, you mean weirdos.