Starbucks says Niccol can live in his home in Newport Beach, California and commute to Starbucks’ head office 1,000 miles away on a corporate jet

  • Farid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even if we are talking about specifically jets that are owned privately, they could have legit use cases. It’s the abuse that is the issue. I agree with the whole “eat the rich” sentiment, but that’s a separate issue. In the system where rich people exist, the problem is abuse.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I vote for we start destroying the private jets without reservation and if we encounter a legitimate use case we’ll deal with it at that time.

        • P00ptart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That worked for me, that and sugar free Gatorade. Took me down from 8.3 to 4.5 without insuline. That being said, I’m an anomaly in that I don’t eat much processed food or bread. Just a really bad pop addiction.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Legit use cases… Make A Wish comes to mind, but maybe that’d be a corporate jet or not a traditionally-private jet.

      Any exemptions for sports teams or anything? VIPs whose lives are at risk through no real fault of their own…

      • rainynight65@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        What you’re describing are use cases for charter flights - renting an aircraft for a specific, temporary purpose, usually from a company specialising in such flights - they own or lease the aircraft and employ the flight crew and maintenance staff.