• TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I didn’t say that communism can’t work. I’m just saying people try to fuck it up for their benefit, whatever it is.

    Maybe people will get better over time and be less likely to do that. Really though I think it’s just something we have to account for, by developing robust social systems that can’t easily be abused, not without being caught.

    • relay@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      People are self interested yes. Eliminating rent seeking behavior that is enabled by private property makes the social system harder to game for helping themselves at the cost societal good. Communists want to eliminate private property for this reason. Does this mean that all anti social behavior will be eliminated? No, but most crime is committed due to lack of economic opportunity. Politicians not doing what is in the interest of the people that elected them is often due to capitalist funded lobbying firms. Not having private property addresses those problems and other problems that are caused by those problems.

    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Marxism has an answer to the idea of people getting better. “Human nature” as you see it is a result of material conditions. If we change the material conditions we change “human nature”

    • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t say that communism can’t work. I’m just saying people try to fuck it up for their benefit, whatever it is.

      The same was true of capitalism when it was getting started in rural late medieval England, but here we are.

      Maybe people will get better over time and be less likely to do that. Really though I think it’s just something we have to account for, by developing robust social systems that can’t easily be abused, not without being caught.

      Democracy in every home and workplace (also known as communism) should take care of this.

      “Maybe people will get better over time”—it’s certainly a choice people have. We can kill ourselves with capitalism or build a better world for everyone with communism.

    • very_poggers_gay [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      People, particularly the wealthy, try to fuck things up for their benefit because capitalism has so deeply engrained in them a sense of rabid and egocentric individualism, and has taught them that having more than others makes them good, and if they have more than others it’s because they’re good.

      The poor are “abusing” social systems because many of those systems lock them into poverty, where they’re forced into a game of economic limbo, which withholds any/all benefits if they earn too much (which is still not enough to live on), or they do things to receive more support than what the state says they are owed with the goal of having an acceptable standard of living, if they can even achieve that.

      Neither of these problems will be solved by people “getting better over time”, and in fact, we are all observing these things getting worse and worse. Reforming social safety nets can maybe provide a solution to the latter problem, if they’re drastic enough. But, imo, communism provides the solution to both.