~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO – you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it’s not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

  • suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    How about a DNS-based ad-blocking service? NextDNS is pretty good and not expensive. You should check if you can set custom DNS servers on that Chromebook, though.

    • kalpol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      DNS over https bypasses much of that, right? till you find and block those DNS servers

    • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have Yunohost installed on my local network and they have DNS adblocking apps that you can install.

      You can also very easily install apps like Owncloud to have your own version of Google Drive.

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That probably will not be suitable because the Chromebook could leave the home network.