• SomeRandomAccount@burggit.moeM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shota is more of a physical descriptor than an age thing. I’ll leave this post up, but future posts should tend towards younger-looking characters.

    • MishikoYuki@burggit.moeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well they are teenagers, which is usually classified under shota. Do you mean that you want this community to focus on younger shotas so adolescents shouldn’t be posted?

      • SomeRandomAccount@burggit.moeM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t classify it as shota based on its appearance alone (the post was also reported as not containing a shota). I do want the community to focus on younger shotas, but if the people here consider this shota it can stay. I would consider this the upper limit on what should be posted though.