“Suno’s training data includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet.”

“Rather than trying to argue that Suno was not trained on copyrighted songs, the company is instead making a Fair Use argument to say that the law should allow for AI training on copyrighted works without permission or compensation.”

Archived (also bypass paywall): https://archive.ph/ivTGs

  • antler@feddit.rocks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Taking other people’s creative works to create your own for-profit product is illegal in every way except when AI does it.

    No, actually its completely legal to consume content that was uploaded to the internet and then use it as inspiration to create your own works.

      • Zacryon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What is “inspiration” in your opinion and how would that differ from machine learning algorithms?

      • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Humans do. Humans guide and use AI towards what they want to make. And AI don’t make for-profit products either, that’s also humans.