cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know, so long as we can agree that lack of supply is the core issue

    It’s one of the core issues. I think there is a lot more baked into this, but if this is one of the things we can agree on then so be it.

    I’m not hugely confident of public housing

    While I do think public housing is a part of the solution, and has a lot of mistakes to learn from, I think co-ops should be the main workhorse/end goal for government built housing.

    public housing or just loosening zoning and allowing the market to actually meet demand, I don’t really care so long as there are units.

    I say, all of the above. Any possible way to increase the supply is a good thing.