• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t really care about the honking so much as I do the fact that this mandates that the car track its position.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      “[an] integrated vehicle system that uses, at minimum, the GPS location of the vehicle compared with a database of posted speed limits, to determine the speed limit, and utilizes a brief, one-time visual and audio signal to alert the driver each time they exceed the speed limit by more than 10 miles per hour.”

      Honestly the only part of this that is unreasonable is that it isn’t immediately followed with “the database updates will be maintained and provided in an open, unencrypted format for free for the life of the vehicle, and the tracking data cannot be used for any other purpose”. GPS is a one-way, triangulation-based signal. It doesn’t inherently track or leak anything. I think we would be a lot safer if we all could agree what speed to go.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think we would all be safer if we recognized individual competence and attention as the key ingredient in safety, and stopped trying to replace human attention with an ever-expanding set of sensors and woefully inadequate algorithms for determining whether the driver is being safe.

        Like, if they have to model the driver as someone who’s not paying attention, then the whole design philosophy of the car is fucked, and we’re designing for failure.

        • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I agree. And the whole design philosophy of the car was fucked when manufacturers were allowed to build SUVs and oversized trucks that weigh 2+ tons and don’t require any additional certification or licensure.

          • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The statistics around accidents with large vehicles like that are less about their operation and more that they exist at all. Accidents will always happen, certification or no. The issue is someone struck by one will be more likely to sustain heavier or critical injuries, and smaller cars offer less protection for their passengers when hit by heavier vehicles.

            So rather than “you can use one of these completely unnecessary vehicles if you pass a test once”, they should just be outlawing them all together as basic consumer vehicles. If they aren’t being designed for specific utilities or business purposes, you can’t make them and sell them to just anyone.

  • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    What I’m reading is that every car will have to be equipped with functioning GPS that’s going to check against a database of speed limits.

    —Speed limits that can change and be out of date. —GPS data that could be stored and extracted from the dealership and sold or given to the government, insurance companies, and law enforcement. —GPS data that could be sent in real time if the car has a cellular connection or hijacks the cellular connection in your phone when you connect it to the car.

    This is bad. Really really bad.

    • hikaru755@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree with your first point, but the latter two:

      —GPS data that could be stored and extracted from the dealership and sold or given to the government, insurance companies, and law enforcement. —GPS data that could be sent in real time if the car has a cellular connection or hijacks the cellular connection in your phone when you connect it to the car.

      Why do you think this is more likely to happen with this new regulation, when most modern cars already have a functioning GPS module for navigation and cellular connection for software updates?

      • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s the standardizing that worries me. When it’s required, people probably aren’t going to be able to truly turn off their GPS (maybe this is already a thing, I don’t know).

        Edit: And when it’s classified as a safety feature, it will [most likely] be illegal to disable, making car owners criminals if they refuse to be tracked.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m surprised California dealerships aren’t on top of this as a huge threat to their industry. Everyone will want to buy a car out of state.

  • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    There are definitely areas of California where going less than 10 miles over the speed limit will put you well under the flow of traffic in every lane. If you’re not going 80 on 80, you’re gonna have a bad time.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Plenty of spots on the 80 I cruise the speed limit in the 2nd slowest lane without any troubles. Just because a few people need to fly doesn’t mean the rest of the world does.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      My friend drives a big rig and every time someone cuts him off there is an annoying alarm.

      • Sizzler@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Its not just that, it’s measuring their speed and distance and if they cut in and start braking it can send the lorry into an auto hard breaking moment where the hazards come on. Give lorries space.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why would you spend such a large amount of money for a new car? I don’t get it. If you are middle class it is like 50% or more of a whole year of income. If you are wealthy it’s still stupid to waste so much money on a thing that generally will depreciate in value. I don’t understand why so many of my co workers keep buying cars so they can go to work and buy more cars.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      We only leased a new car because it was literally cheaper to lease than to buy used last fall. The market was absolutely upside down. Plan on buying it at the end of the 33 mo lease.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        In the states I can see how having a car is a practical necessity, I just don’t have faith that buying new cars is the environmental answer we are told it is by car manufacturers

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not trying to say we should never buy new cars, but I do have a feeling making tens of millions of new cars has a worse environmental impact than driving and repairing and old car,

        But I do see in places like big cities how smog can become an issue…. But we are ignoring the whole mountaintops and other environmental impacts from making the new metal and batteries in my opinion…

  • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Sounds like a great way to track people and further moderate their lives instead of doing things that actually matter and make an impact. No thanks.