• mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 months ago

    users of apps with a communication function would have to agree via terms and conditions or pop-up messages that all images and videos sent to others will be scanned automatically and possibly reported to the EU and the police.

    This is more like coercion than consent.

    And let’s be clear: The goal of legislation like this is not to allow investigating child abusers, which can already be done legally. The goal is to impose mass surveillance on the population, circumventing due process.

  • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 months ago

    They always hide behind the claim it’s for the children… but how many children have they actually saved from this?

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      They always hide behind the claim it’s for the children

      Sometimes it’s the terrorists.

    • Beaver @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re probably gonna put parents behind bars for a misunderstanding on their private lives

      • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 months ago

        This reminds me of that time google was scanning photos and reported a man to the police for being a pedophile, turns out it was a father sending a picture to his doctor

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    If consent mattered, governments and corporations all around the world wouldn’t be pushing to expand the global surveillance apparatus.

    Is this just another Tuesday now? Fuck me.