"The House was in session at the Capitol on Thursday, but thanks to the latest procession of Republicans reporting for duty in front of a Manhattan criminal courthouse to show support for former President Donald J. Trump at his trial, the party risked ceding its control of the floor,” the New York Times reports.

“Almost a dozen House Republicans showed up at the courthouse on Thursday…”

“Republicans control the House by such a slim margin, 217-213, that just two defections can sink legislation if all members are present and voting — and just a few absences can erase their majority altogether. The show of support for Mr. Trump from such a large group of members meant that for much of Thursday, the G.O.P. may have handed the floor over to Democrats, leaving themselves exposed on the House floor.”

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d like to see the flight expense claims from these House Repubs and whether taxpayers are funding their trips to kiss the ring in Manhattan.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nah, we treat it like sports teams, that goes for pretty much everyone. Maybe one side more than the other, but make no mistake, both parties treat it like sports teams.

        • cedarmesa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Youre getting downvoted but if people would take time to consider what you are saying you are just flat wrong so ima go ahead and downvote. Thank you for your service.

  • Backspacecentury@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with these people? You go from being the “law and order” party to being the party of one of the biggest con men of the past century.

    • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      So now you know they were never actually a “law and order” party, just as they’ve never actually been a “fiscal responsibility” or “liberties and freedoms” party. These are just words they say to their base when it is convenient.

    • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Law and order” has always been a dog whistle for “oppressing minorities”. They’ve just dropped the pretense, is all.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Conservatives have always been the “law and order” party.

        They want to use the law to order you to accept their monarchy and their religion.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    They know the Democrats don’t have the balls to try and sneak legislative actions by when they’re not there. They’re too focused on decorum and wanting a strong Republican party to undermine the Republicans.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Sneak” is a loaded term. I think what you mean is “do their job like they’re supposed and vote like they usually would.” It’s not like they’re holding a secret/special session under the Republicans noses. They’re just at work when they’re supposed to be and others aren’t. The alternative to “sneaking” legislative action in this case is just not doing their jobs for the day because a bunch of people decided not to show up. 12 people don’t show up, so they send the other 400+ home for the day? Is that the moral expectation?

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Good call. I fell for the trap I was upset about, it’s literally just their job, but they won’t do it the same way they didn’t want to confirm judges near the end of Barrys second term.

        • No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          This was not about being scared and more of a social contract

          They would not select judges on the end of a presidents turn, based on the trust that the other party wouldn’t either

          As soon as one party stops holding to this unwritten agreement (as Republicans did under Trump), there is little to no incentive for the other party to continue abiding to it

          • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Im sorry but “I made a tacit verbal agreement about choices that deeply shape the law of the entire country with an untrustworthy group of people who went on to break it when everyone was warning they would break it” isn’t better. In fact that changes the narrative from ‘Dems being too stuck to principles to make the right choice’ to ‘Dems are simply not intelligent enough to make the right choice’, and either way they got played.

  • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I thought that this is why they put the FART team in place, to guard the floor. Clearly they’ve weakened the FART, but as we all know, you should never trust a weak FART.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The House was in session at the Capitol on Thursday, but thanks to the latest procession of Republicans reporting for duty in front of a Manhattan criminal courthouse to show support for former President Donald J. Trump at his trial, the party risked ceding its control of the floor.

    House Republicans had a vote scheduled for Thursday afternoon to rebuke President Biden for his decision to pause an arms shipment to Israel and compel his administration to quickly deliver weapons.

    Democratic leaders in the House had advised their members to vote “no,” calling the measure “another partisan stunt by Extreme MAGA Republicans who are determined to hurt President Biden politically.”

    The group that showed up in Manhattan on Thursday was composed of lawmakers who rarely shy from disrupting legislative business in the Capitol or embarrassing the party on the House floor.

    The Oversight Committee postponed a meeting scheduled for Thursday morning to vote on holding Merrick B. Garland, the attorney general, in contempt of Congress, rescheduling it for 8 p.m.

    With five of the panel’s members — Representatives Andy Biggs of Arizona, Michael Cloud of Texas, Mike Waltz of Florida, Ms. Boebert and Ms. Luna — in Manhattan, the G.O.P.


    The original article contains 728 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • SlippiHUD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    They should oust Mike Johnson, and make Hakeem Jefferies the Speaker and change the rules so it requires a majority of democrats to oust him.