• kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s sort of like how YouTube ran at a loss for a long time. The idea is to get ingrained in the market and make up the money later.

    Right now Meta has the best VR / AR that is easily accessible. If some new idea or technology catapults VR into a more popular position, then Meta is in a prime position to take advantage.

    Will that happen? I don’t know, but Meta seems to think so.

    • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Meta is the only reason I’m staying away from their AR/VR headsets. If it was any other company, I would have jumped in by now.

    • Gigan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think the technology is there yet. As long as people need to wear big bulky goggles and headsets it’s not going to take off. Make something that’s about as cumbersome as sunglasses and less than $1000 and there might be mass adoption.

      • SebKra@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        March 2023 they sold 20M Quests. Half as many as PS5. That counts as “taken off” in my book.

        • Gigan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wow, I’m shocked it’s that high. I’ve never heard of someone using one.

        • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Daily active users are a much better indicator of success.

          Halo infinite had a peak player count if 272,000. Now it sees DAU of only 3,000

  • exanime@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    As others have said, the implication in this article’s title is silly… Surely an r&d phase start easily explains this

    What I’m curious about is how you spend that much money in such little time? Was that money actually spent or just committed?

  • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Business lesson, : never build a factory because it won’t pay for itself in the first year.

    And yes I know it’s hard to hear but Meta’s vr is doing really well in the areas they targeted, industry, academia, and special use. This is likely to end up a profitable part of their business for a long time.

    • kellenoffdagrid❓️@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah unfortunately I agree, as much as I dread knowing Meta’s going to be behind a lot of the VR/AR developments as it gets more common, this isn’t really an indication that they screwed up. They’re not the first company I’d want to lead the VR market but it looks like they will be regardless.