- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
- technology@beehaw.org
- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
- technology@beehaw.org
publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://beehaw.org/post/13437780
This service is still in Alpha release but is already deployable and usable, and federates with other Fediverse servers.
However, there is no “main” instance you go to join. The intention really is that you host your own instance for yourself and a few friends and family. To this end, it is designed to be very lightweight and will happily run on a Raspberry Pi or even a $5/pm VPS.
This is taking a very different approach from say Mastodon which has one main instance everyone could join, but then it sits with the issue that everyone joins there, and it becomes a bit “centralised”. GoToSocial has been designed as lightweight for self-hosting, and also has a Docker image installation, so it makes it really easy for (and encourages) most people to host their own instance.
It seems to also be focussed very much around privacy (defaults to unlisted posts) and permission controls (for example, you have an option to post to mutual-only where both people follow each other). Also, by hosting your own service you set the rules, and you are also your own admin. You can choose to turn off likes, replies, boosts, etc as well. Being your own admin also means you can easily adjust the post length as well.
It does conform to the Mastodon API so apparently some Mastodon clients will also work fine with it.
See https://github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/
#technology #ActivityPub #GoToSocial
So far out of all the fediverse i have found lemmy fits me best. So many other things want to mimic the X interface and that promotes more following of individuals and whatever they post about rather than ideas. I do much better over here because you follow a general topic and the posts are about that thing or related things. And I find that I do better in comments than making original posts. Like, I am a very introverted person, so have trouble getting a conversation started. But when I see a conversation of interest, I can generally add something to it.
If they weren’t all insane, twitter’s format has value for following real time events. For sports, for example, following a personally curated selection of sports reporters makes it a lot easier to keep up with transactions across the leagues I care about.
Reddit’s is better for discussion of those events, but not everything gets that far.
Facebook’s is supposed to be for actual friends to keep up with what’s going on in each other’s lives. Obviously it’s not actually talking, and you still want to do that, but it makes it easier to keep up with a larger group of people.
The problem with all of them is that they’re owned and run by insane shitbags, so they’re not worth the trade off. And the problem with fediverse alternatives is that they all rely on network effect to have their value. But in theory they each have a place, which is how they all managed to coexist despite the strong constraint of needing volume to serve a purpose. They serve different uses.
Yeah, the mastodon-style interface lends well to real-time events like sports, as you mentioned, or news. Because it’s just a feed of what’s going on.
Getting regular people to host a service exposed to the Internet is going to go very smoothly I’m sure.
Somebody is going to have to run a public server unfortunately.
The “Follow me” format is bad for the internet. It creates “me me me” fake celebrities and “influencers.”