• Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ask a man his salary. Do it. How else are you supposed to learn who is getting underpaid? The only way to rectify that problem is to learn about it in the first place.

  • kernelle@0d.gs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Publicly available data” - I wonder if that includes Disney’s catalogue? Or Nintendo’s IP? I think they are veeery selective about their “Publicly available data”, it also implies the only requirement for such training data is that it is publicly available, which almost every piece of media ever? How an AI model isn’t public domain by default baffles me.

    • Programmer Belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem is that if copyrighted works are used, you could generate a copyrighted artwork that would be made into public domain, stripping its protection. I would love this approach, the problem is the lobbyists don’t agree with me.

      • kernelle@0d.gs
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not necessarily, if a model is public domain, there could still be a lot of proprietary elements used in interpreting that model and actually running it. If you own the hardware and generate something using AI, I’d say the copyright goes to you. You use AI as the brush to paint your painting and the painting belongs to you, but if a company allows you to use their canvas and their painting tools, it should go to them.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you rent a brush to paint with, is the painting not yours? If you rent a musical instrument to record an original song with, is the song not yours?