• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          So, basically, if you tolerate the intolerant, the intolerant will eventually wipe out tolerance.

          A more accurate way to say it is, “if you tolerate the intolerant BEING intolerant, intolerance will eventually wipe out tolerance.”

          It does not say you should be intolerant of the intolerant while they’re minding their own business. I just think a bar owner is free to kick people out for representing Nazis purely because it’s their bar and they can do what they want.

          But X’s problem is a bit different from the Nazi Bar problem, in that you don’t really see the Neo Nazis on X sitting there minding their own business. You ONLY see them voicing their intolerance. Which of course, should not be tolerated.

          Tolerate tolerate tolerate. There.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It does not say you should be intolerant of the intolerant while they’re minding their own business

            it is a fallacy that the intolerant mind their own business. being intolerant is, itself, an active state, not a passive one, and one to be actively resisted. being intolerant involves choice, a choice to be intolerant. there is no “minding one’s own business” in being intolerant, as being intolerant necessarily involves minding the business of others ad then making the choice to react to it hatefully.

            so your argument is, itself, spurious for it is fallacious in its foundation.

            gtfo with your nazi apologism

            The Paradox of Tolerance

            Tolerate tolerate tolerate. There.

      • Mint@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        You have a bar: Nazi comes into your bar, you let him stay, because why not its just a single nazi. Nazi invites friends, those friends invite their friends, and so on. Now you a have nazi bar.

  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    With so many options becoming available, increasingly less people will select the platform preferred by Nazis.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    At this point Musk has platformed all of the undesirables of the internet. He’s a big, blinking, neon sign that says “there are no adults in the room, do whatever you want.”

    That could be a service to the rest of us. It would be nice if, now that they’re all concentrated there, the internet could quietly agree to shadowban the entire site. Just disappear it from search results, conversation, “zeitgeist.” Let all of the toxic users keep each other busy while the rest of us enjoy a cleaner internet.

  • Storksforlegs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    At least thats kind of reassuring in a way, that part of it is people dont want to associate with that stuff. (Though I realize that isnt the only reason)

  • ULS@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s morbid but the only use it has to me is info on live shitty events.

  • ulkesh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes, this is what happens when you take a big shit in people’s cereal. They tend to leave. I, too, could be an analyst.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    My wife insists she’s staying there for the news and legal people she follows and she has a point. A lot of government, business, and schools continue to use it as an easy way to broadcast information.

    Threads pulled off some celebrities, Bsky some policy and legal wonks, and Mastodon the tech geeks. If these services all start federating together and offering unified text and hashtag search, then where you land won’t matter.

    Until then, it’ll be hard to get people to switch away, even with all the bad press.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      the death spiral is in progress, elon’s just rich so he can pay bills (or let leases go resulting in eviction…) for a while

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      When the “large” voices leave in significant numbers - in the UK it is used wildly by public sector and charity organisations, there are official governmental Twitter accounts, all the broadcasters have accounts.

      • Midnitte@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Really wish I could convince local government entities to switch to Mastodon - my local police said it was “subject to O.P.R.A.” and needed to meet retention rules (if you rolled your own…), and the state wildfire commission said they were looking at Threads :/

        So instead, both are still stuck on the platform that requires a login to see posts and filled with nazis.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think Threads federation may actually help with. I’m trying to persuade a health body at the moment to switch from Twitter and to roll their own Mastodon instance, based on the fact that what they really want is the widget on the website, control of their data and the ability to reach people.

          Twitter has already screwed the widget with the login/authentication requirements. If
          Threads actually allows its users to see Mastodon posts, that’s a big old reachable audience.

    • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      So at what point does/did it reach death spiral?

      It isn’t so much a spiral as it is a series of 90 degree turns.

  • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I stopped using it when squacker stopped working, though I don’t think I’m in that statistic because I never had a twitter account.