• KairuByte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can agree with something someone says, and disagree with something else they say or do.

      • gonzo0815@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Would you be comfortable quoting Hitler and agreeing with the content?

        Edit: to be more precise, I neither equate O’Hair with Hitler nor do I imply that OP knew about her holocaust denial. I’m simply pointing out that a quote can’t always be separated from its source.

        • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          > Do not compare yourself to others. If you do so, you are insulting yourself. > - Adolf Hitler

          Yeah it’s not hard to agree with that, even if the guy was a monster of the worst kind.

          Maybe I should quote someone else who said something similar, would be less controversial and to not put the asshat on pedestral, but in this case it was likely the OP didn’t know much about the person and just saw a text he agreed on.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The difference being, Hitler was well known for his bigotry. Some quotes are popular because they express an idea in a clever or entertaining way. Other quotes are used to invoke the gravitas of the original speaker or the original context. Sometimes it’s a bit of both.

          Quoting Hitler, even for something relatively benign like his lunch order, implies that you support his ideology and actions. “I’ll have the salad, just like Hitler” has an obvious undertone of bigotry. Hitler might have shared some truisms, but chances are you can find similar, alternative quotes from famous people who didn’t commit a genocide.

          Hardly anyone knows who Madeline O’Whatever is, and knowing she is a Holocaust denier, to me, means that she’s a nutjob. But it doesn’t mean all of her statements are false. The above statement is true, regardless of any unrelated delusions held by the speaker.

          • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I’ll have a glass of water, just like Hitler.

            She was a big deal for early atheism and was kind of a nutjob.

        • DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sure, but with the context he was:

          1. factually correct.
          2. there isn’t some ulterior motive in the quote, e.g. racism, antisemitism, nationalism, etc.

          Or to put it another way, I would be comfortable saying, “he was a dog shit human being, but he was right that one time.”

  • Badass_panda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    So look, I appreciate the sentiment, but none of that stuff happened to you or your families, or anyone you’ve ever met … so using “us” here send a bit of an edgelord vibe.

    There are a lot of groups of people who Christians are currently oppressing, beating, and sometimes killing across the globe, but the time that “atheists” are among those groups passed quite some time ago.

    There’s no need for this kind of moral posturing to dismiss Christians’ desire to enforce their religion on others. It’s not a right they have, end stop.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I occasionally get a coworker making jokes about me not having morals or something, but that’s about it.

      • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s because they have no power over you. They showed you who they are and beware of them if they ever gain power over you, more so if they can swing their weight around with impunity

        • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s a mixed bag. The latest two are actually really great guys that have my back and we just like fucking with each other. I’ve had people do it to hide their own faith crisis in the past and we’ve all dealt with standard issue cunts.

      • Badass_panda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not what I’m advocating for. The fact is, humanism is a far more widely practiced religion than Christianity and requires no belief in a god. Fascists killing you for being gay is much more prevalent of an issue than Christians killing you for being a heretic.

        This kind of language makes atheists look like edgelords trying to glom on to other people’s suffering in order to claim moral high ground via victimhood. It’s not necessary or helpful.

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    While I agree with the overall message that it is laughable to act like they’re being persecuted in this modern day when they used to literally torture folks like us to death, it sounds so, so edgy said like this