• zephyreks@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Books deserve to exist, even if they write about something you disagree with. We as a community need to be able to stand up to these challenges

    • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree books shouldn’t be banned, but similar to other media, maybe having them bundled with additional materials would be a good idea.

      I don’t mean including a whole other book, but a simple insert like on some of the older cartoons. “The way that some characters are drawn in this comic was widely seen as socially acceptable when it was printed but is now considered to be a dehumanizing racist stereotype. If you would like to learn more about the topic, looking into the history of Jim Crow or minstrel shows is a good place to start. This media remains in our library because it is important to show history as it happened instead of trying to erase it.”

      Edit: Typos galore

      • ROldford@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve always been a fan of how German libraries treat Nazi-related works: still available, but in the Giftschrank or “poison cabinet”. That way, you can limit access to trusted researchers. It’s a good compromise between the importance of access to knowledge and acknowledging the danger of that level of hate.

  • vaccinationviablowdart@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ^omg I wrote a way too long comment^

    The term “culture war” is excessively very dismissive. The subjects that people take issue to here are matters of material well being.

    People in the article and comments are using the word “ban” alot. I don’t think there is any request to “ban” anything. It is just the one library. When something is “banned” it is prohibited from all sources. After actually taking a look at the list of books I don’t think any of them should be removed from the collection on the basis of the complaints. I do think some of them could be re-shelved. But getting all worked up about a few random complaints that literally anyone can make because they are in a bad mood, and obliquely referring to nazis/holocaust is going way overboard.

    I was curious so I did some looking at the actual titles since the person who wrote this article didn’t have time I guess. There are 3 themes in the target books.

    theme 1: lgbt and sex positive books for young people

    Looks like about 1/3 of the target works are pro-LGBT/sexpositive and seeking to explain this to some young audiences. I wasn’t familiar with Cory Silverberg so I looked up the amazon page for You Know, Sex:

    In a bright graphic format featuring four dynamic middle schoolers, You Know, Sex grounds sex education in social justice, covering not only the big three of puberty—hormones, reproduction, and development—but also power, pleasure, and how to be a decent human being.

    I added emphasis because… what a thing to complain about.

    To me this book sounds perfectly nice. But whoever requests for it to be removed likely thinks it’ll cause kids to come to harm. Who knows what kinds of delusional thinking motivated the specific complaint. But it isn’t “culture war” because they are under the impression that this book will be dangerous physically and socially and spiritually.

    theme 2: racist caricatures and other hate imagery in children’s books

    Another 1/3 of the complaints are about children’s books depicting racist or hateful imagery. I think these complaints are legitimate. Books like this should be available for adults but not circulated to little kids! They are of historical interest, not entertainment.

    I borrowed Asterix the Gladiator from the Internet Archive Library and flipped through it. Here is one of panels which is probably at issue. (I am not sure about the etiquette/politics of sharing this. I would consider feedback in the direction of not sharing racist material.) I have blurred out the actual caricature but described what is depicted in text. I put it in the spoiler. Summary: it’s exactly what you think it’ll be.

    spoiler

    This panel depicts a person with dark brown skin, a very small skull, eyes so close together that they touch and are crossed, a huge open mouth with giant red lips (larger than skull) and one tooth sticking out, wide nose, big ears, goofy body language.


    I don’t care to actually read this so I don’t know what the plot is about. But I can say that flipping through it, the people with brown skin only come into view a few times in dozens of pages. They are not characters in the story, just devices the author occasionally employs. They are present 1-3 panels at a time.

    They look to be in positions of servitude. They do not perform their jobs properly and are therefor deserving subjects of violence by the characters with pink skin. Many pages earlier, a masseurs with brown skin gives too deep a massage to a solider with pink skin. So the soldier beats him. The masseur’s boss complains: “You have no right to beat up my masseurs! They’re horribly expensive this season!” The most superficial joke being that the only reason not to beat the person with brown skin is the economic impact on some other person with pink skin. The person with brown skin has no lines and is depicted in a racist, caricatured way similar to the spoiler above. Except instead of being goofy he is big and strong. So strong he casually (and presumably accidentally) hurts the person with pink skin. Once he is punched so hard he flies across the room, he disappears from the story.

    I remember when I was a kid, seeing this kind of thing. This series looks vaguely framiliar but there is a whole cannon of this shit. My parents did their best to raise me explicitly anti racist and I recognized the messaging as vile. I understood that it was communicating a generalized degradation and inhumanity related to perceived race. In both the presence (as objects) and their absence (as full characters). I remember being confused why people I thought of as “good” would have stuff like this lying around. But I am sure that it got into my head anyway. Sometimes really horrid stereotype illustrations I saw as a kid pop into my mind’s eye. I wish I didn’t have those in my brain because they are despicable. If an adult intentionally wishes to study hate lit it is different.

    This is the kind of thing that teaches from a young age “black lives don’t matter”. Black people only involved as props, punchlines, animalistic, deserving subjects of violence etc.

    There are a bazillion kids books that aren’t trash like this. I vote to move these to whatever the dewey decimal is for historical hate literature, in the adult section. Possibly in the Reference library to convey the seriousness. I didn’t investigate the other children’s books but it seems that they are all on a similar theme and not appropriate for kids.

    theme 3: right wing nutjobs

    The remaining 1/3 of the books are more recent publications which appear to be regressive shitty books full of lies. I know the Shrier book has been thoroughly widely debunked criticized rebuked. It is full of medical falsehoods and her own weird fantasies misrepresented as scientific. It primarily advocates for denial of health care to trans people. This is not “culture war”. She literally wants to seize control and manipulate the balance of chemicals in the bodies of other people. It is as material as you can get.

    The other books by the likes of Beck, Ngo are certainly full of bullshit. Judging by the title and my understanding of the authors, they will probably be encouraging violence. I had never heard of Forbes before. The book is highly rated on amazon and the top rated review begins:

    Fantastic book. As a supporter of those bands I found that the information in it is invaluable.

    Emphasis added. Reviewer is a fan of white supremacist music and ideas. All the positive reviews are from people who are straight up white power jackasses.

    I found this review on goodreads that I think is probably accurate:

    This thing is f***ng nightmare. Read it for research on a project. It ended up being really valuable as a primary source, but if you’re not literally writing a book about white nationalist skinheads, I can’t imagine wanting to read the biased blathering of a bunch of racist boneheads reminiscing about their glory days.

    This person also describes who there is value in the book even though the topic really sucks.

    It seems like this book gives really shitty people good feelings about themselves. That sucks. When this kind of people feel good about themselves, they like to go around kicking the shit out of people who are just minding their own business. They form militias and murder. The reason someone was bothered by this book is likely because they know it can help stir the pot and encourage street violence. I know people who’ve been targeted by these douche bags. It’s serious.

    This book costs about $200-300 to purchase. It should be in the reference library with all the other expensive books, not in circulation.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ideological radicalization is the reality that we are living in. Why should we hide it? Hiding these books behind barriers isn’t going to make these problems go away.

  • BringMeTheDiscoKing@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure they’d find that if they visited the library and took themselves to section 335.6 they’d find several books about a similar phenomenon where large groups of people are encouraged to think the same.

  • Nogami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t a culture war. It’s 100% political, and that’s not culture.

  • Sha'ul@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    HUH?!?! Challenging the existance of books and CD’s?

    How tormentve is life for people who want to censor the reality of contrary views, opinions, and lfestyles? Filing a complaint because there’s a certain book found at a library, it’s not an insult to say these mental midgets are pathetically weak chidren.

    To be that stunted and under developed, life will forever be a torturefest until they learn to happily live besides neighbours who can’t agree with them or support their views.

    The people who complained about books are irrelevent in society and are hollow empty beings wirh nothing to offer anyone else because everything they do is about self and they are forced to tolerate that other life forms exist besides themself.