Trader Joe’s, SpaceX, and Meta are arguing in lawsuits that government agencies protecting workers and consumers—the NLRB and FTC—are “unconstitutional.”

Trader Joe’s has become the second company in a month to sue the National Labor Relations Board for being “unconstitutional,” following the lead of Elon Musk’s SpaceX, as both companies face board charges for firing employees. These two major corporations aren’t alone in attempting to protect their interests by undermining public institutions; Meta is also arguing in an ongoing lawsuit that the Federal Trade Commission is unconstitutional.

A legal expert told Motherboard that these companies are attempting to take advantage of what they believe is a friendly Supreme Court—judges currently lean right by a six-to-three margin—while they can.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    In a nation where corporations literally have more rights and fewer responsibilities than people, I see this as theater.

    The owners will get their way. They own this fucking place.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m going to create custom electronic components as attachments for the guillotines. In particular, a screen that can be placed in front of the user. A Heads-Up Display.

  • KuroeNekoDemon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Excuse me? What the fuck? Get the fuck out of here assholes. How did someone not throw this case out? This is why I don’t support US companies anymore especially the mega corporations. Good thing I’m not American but good luck to my southern neighbours

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Certain people are asking SOME of the right questions, but the actions allowing these narcissistic ass hats to run wild is certainly clear.

    We need a solid change of guard in the US to wrestle us back from teetering on the edge of a true Corporatocracy, but I fear we’re kind of already there having seen what’s happening with all these companies just absorbing smaller entities at breakneck speed to remove competition, and little to no barriers to slow or stop them. Everyone is so quick to sellout instead of working hard to compete. Pretty sad.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      bernie was literally the last hope we had to bring change, and guess what;

      obama, clinton personally killed that potential progress

      if anyone is to blame its fucking Obama and the DNC for demanding conservatism in the face of fascists.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Bill Clinton killed off any rejection of Reagan. The rest is the lack of any political structure beyond the state and corporations.

        • JDPoZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’m afraid it’s worse than that.

          Basically after FDR died, for as imperfect as he was… all the objective good he did was slowly whittled away by members of both parties - simply at differing rates.

          With Truman put in as his VP after the DNC suggested replacing FDR’s first VP - Henry “I want to pass a civil rights bill in the 1940s” Wallace for their more “centrist” candidate, we dropped 2 atomic weapons on civilian cities.

          Kennedy was the first real neoliberal in that he came from a dynastically wealthy family and successfully dropped the top marginal tax rate that FDR had helped set at 90% down to 60%… which helped create massive budget shortages about a decade later. LBJ got us into Vietnam. Carter was too nice to ever use the bully pulpit and also let his own personal Protestant work ethic dictate his own policy goals which he seemed to back with the idea that things like the oil crisis should be a burden that every day Americans shoulder rather than the massive giant multinational oil companies, and then after Reagan won 2x and Bush “my family worked with the Nazis” Sr. won a term afterward, Clinton pivoted the last remaining New Deal democrats to a 3rd way where they abandoned the working class for a more palatable version of Republicanism.

          Bernie really could have been a turning point, but instead all that has happened is the accelerating worsening of all our lives alternating between the hands of the ultra rich who only do it slowly… and the hands of increasingly fascistic nakedly monstrous ultra rich ghouls and their goons.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yup. If corporations are people, then where is the death penalty when you actually need it.

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve been saying from the beginning that the thing Trump did that would truly damage the country the most was appoint these justices

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think the broader concept being worked on here is to ‘dissolve’ governments, or at least relegate them to a back seat while corporations are in the drivers seat.

    I’m surprised form of corporate nationality hasn’t been introduced, where some guaranteed set of rights is extended to you by a corporation, for an annual fee.

    I also think this highlights a fundamental issue with constitutional republics, is that they failed to imagine a scenario where corporations would eclipse governments in the capability to wield raw power. This is why I dismiss arguments about censorship and freedom of speech on social media platforms. Its not about private versus public ownership, its about the power to suppress and reach. I don’t think we can fault victorian era framers for not quite understanding the impacts technology would have on these things.

    • The documentary “the corporation” explains this stuff in great detail. Our founders fully understood the dangers corporations posed. Corporations could only exist under a temporary charter. Corporations were given extraordinary legal exemptions. Corporations could only exist to serve the public good (building the hoover dam) Corporations could only exist for a limited time (til the project was completed). The corporation and charter automatically expired on a set date. Of course at some point the wealthy passed a law to change all this. This permanent corporatocracy we live under is new and was strictly warned against and expressly illegal. The fact that we think of corporations as permanent entities is just evidence of massive corruption.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Snow Crash presented a United States balkanized into little corporate microstates around every franchise, where the Federal Government was just one more franchise operator. Border crossings between Days Inn and Pizza Hut felt surprisingly credible, even in 1992, when Microsoft was the poster child of tech-nopoly. Nevermind the actual company towns of the 19th century, with their own currencies, their own laws, and their own police. The East India Company. Monopoly tends to see government as irrelevant but sometimes useful tool.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    why should most of us be worried? most of us can’t do shit; they are literally not going to listen to us