• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Outdoor cat: “today I killed 300 birds and permanently altered the local ecosystem”

    Indoor cat: “hehe I shit in a box”

    • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And so begins a new battle in the eternal war between Americans with indoor cats and others with outdoor cats.

      It’s pretty difficult to actually find an indoor cat in the UK. In the US it’s common.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I guess we in Finland are Americand now lol

        We’re more worried about the cats wellbeing though than the birds.

        • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          With a name like Kusimulkku I should have guessed. I wouldn’t call you American but you are one of the weirdest countries in Europe. A language designed to confuse with an obsessive dedication to double-consanants. I assume your cats are as unsociable as your people.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which is fitting because, in the end, when the hell have the British cared about the fallout of anything they do

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      More like “today someone left food out for me as usual so I didn’t hunt like I would if I were starving”.

      70% of bird deaths are from fetal and stray cats, not just “outdoor” cats.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        30% of bird deaths is still a lot of bird deaths. I would much prefer if cats were only responsible for 40 small animal extinctions rather than the 60 or so that they’ve caused so far

    • TwoCubed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Our 3 cats kill maybe a total of 5 birds and 10 mice a year. They can’t reproduce and prefer to stay inside for most of the year. They’re not a problem, as many new studies have found out. At least in northern Germany. It might be a bigger problem elsewhere though. Just trying to point out that your criticism may only apply to certain areas.

    • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Not how cats work. Nice job getting butthurt about a funny comic on the internet, though.

      And just so you can be better informed in the future. Feral cats are the ones affecting the ecosystem. Outdoor house cats have a negligible influence on wildlife. Let your cat go outside sometimes.

      And, just a guess, you should probably go outside sometimes too.

      "The magnitude of mortality they cause in mainland areas remains speculative, with large-scale estimates based on non-systematic analyses and little consideration of scientific data. Here we conduct a systematic review and quantitatively estimate mortality caused by cats in the United States. We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality."

      Downvoting doesn’t make you right and it doesn’t make your cats less miserable.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thats exactly how cats work.

        The comic is funny and cute, but dont get it twisted. The science is pretty firm on the destructive effects of invasive domestic cats.

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          "The magnitude of mortality they cause in mainland areas remains speculative, with large-scale estimates based on non-systematic analyses and little consideration of scientific data. Here we conduct a systematic review and quantitatively estimate mortality caused by cats in the United States. We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality."

          Maybe don’t believe every sensationalized social media article that’s really just a barely disguised cat litter ad.

          “The science is pretty firm” lmao

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          "The magnitude of mortality they cause in mainland areas remains speculative, with large-scale estimates based on non-systematic analyses and little consideration of scientific data. Here we conduct a systematic review and quantitatively estimate mortality caused by cats in the United States. We estimate that free-ranging domestic cats kill 1.3–4.0 billion birds and 6.3–22.3 billion mammals annually. Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality."

    • Slovene@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not to mention all the outdoor cats that are themselves killed or horribly injured.

      • Thrashy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The only cat I’ve had that I’ve felt okay with letting roam was a stray that came to us declawed, so he was mostly harmless. We still ended up making him an inside cat because we caught him sneaking into the neighbor’s house to steal their cat’s food and poop in its litterbox.

              • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                Is that how that works though? I don’t know anything about Coyotes, but I know things generally know better than to fuck with cats.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  … Are you asking if a coyote can eat a cat?

                  Do you understand they hunt deer? Theyre not really worried about a cat with clawless arthritis, horn and hoof wounds are much bigger threats.

                  Predators dont know better than to not fuck with cats, most of them know to grab them before they get up a tree.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Absolute environmental disaster, they need to be spayed and neutered and occasionally culled by any competent local government.

      • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        You’ll also need to ban pet cats from walking outside without a leash. Our cats were neutered, didn’t stop them from killing any mice or birds they could get their paws on.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          The reason they need to be spayed and neutered instead of outright killed is because culls don’t really work on animals that reproduce that quickly. Whenever a spot opens up for another cat to make its territory, it gets immediately claimed. There are a ton of research papers that show spaying and neutering is more effective at lowering stray populations, and that euthanization is more costly on top of being less effective.

          • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I was talking about the cats that are kept as pets, not stray cats. I guess it varies from country to country, but most cats walking around outside in Norway are pets (~90%). Reducing the stray cat population to zero wouldn’t fix the issue of cats killing all the small wildlife unless pet cats are also kept inside.

            I wasn’t saying anything against neutering cats.

  • Calavera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wow, today I learned people think it’s better for the cats to keep they locked in… I pity birds who have that kind of life, now I pity those cats too

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Now today you can learn that outdoor cats kill wildlife for fun. You can also learn that outdoor cats have half the life expectancy as indoor cats

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Imagine getting a highly evolved killer as a pet, perfectly tuned for a life of exploration, combat and death, and forcing them to live a long, soft boring life.

      • Calavera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        What’s that point of living more? You’d prefer to live more in a cage? That’s not a point at all. I can understand the wildlife reasoning, but then we should just forbid cats in those places then

  • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    We have 3 indoor/outdoor cats because we’ve just always had indoor/outdoor cats and I never really thought about it.

    Being on more cat-related Reddit and Lemmy communities, I’ve seen more and more of the arguments for keeping cats as indoor-only, and it’s been making me think more about how to care for cats we adopt.

    From what I’ve seen of the discussions, a lot of them seem to center around urban areas and towns, where there’s a high population density. Some arguments also seem to be based off the assumption that the pets aren’t spayed or neutered.

    We live in the middle of nowhere and all our cats are fixed as soon as possible (we’ve had kittens sometimes and they stay inside until then).

    Is there different logic for this situation, or is it the same advice to always keep them indoors?

    I’m genuinely asking.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not all cats are killing machines but with 3, chances are at least one of them is. On the other hand, an outdoor life is probably much more fulfilling for a cat.

      At a minimum, make sure they have bells around their collar so it warns the local wildlife.

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unless you live in the native original range for cats, and your local region has zero automobiles, and you have no issue paying vet bills for random illness or parasite infections, then sure. Its probably not that big a risk to let your cat out unsupervised.

      Brits are very arrogantly incorrect about their cat care. They are driving local wildcats extinct, and feeding their pets to local foxes, badgers, and car wheels.

      You can still supplement outdoor time for your cat tho. Harness/leash training isnt too difficult, just go in areas you dont expect dog walkers. And you can also build catios, outdoor spaces that are fenced in.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        They are driving local wildcats extinct, and feeding their pets to local foxes, badgers, and car wheels.

        Still better than locking them in a cage and never letting them out

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I cannot imagine having an indoor/outdoor cat. I’d worry so much about them while they were away. And if they just disappeared and didn’t return…I don’t know how I could stand it.

    We have 3 indoor-only cats. Obviously I’m pretty attached to them.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Never seen any cat that chose to stay inside even 50% of the time when given a choice. I’d rather they enjoy their life than make me feel better be cause they’re penned up all the time.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Far better to die young under a car tire, bleeding out slowly and painfully alone on the asphalt. Totally agree, way better than living your entire lifespan.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          … in a gilded prison, never really have lived a single day in their entire lives.

          Yeah, I’d take my chances with the tire.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Realistically, outdoor cats don’t travel much. They just hang out in their neighborhood, chill in their favorite spots, etc.

    Cats have their territory and that’s where they spend their time, doing cat things. It’s just that an outdoor cat’s territory isn’t limited by walls.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      There was a BBC documentary a few years ago where they gave GPS tracking collars to a bunch of cats in a neighbourhood and tracked where they went. Each of the cats had their own territory and favourite locations.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Murder local wildlife, cause property damage to neighbors, kill neighbors pets, spread disease. Roaming cats suck, and so do their entitled owners who think that everyone’s property belongs to their pet

      • Umbraveil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        While we’re at it, let’s get rid of birds that shit on everything, deer that eat our gardens, raccoons that get in our trash, skunks that dig up our grass …

        • Pelicanen@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          They brought up how cats disturb the ecosystem and spread disease. You brought up how other animals can disturb people’s capital. These two are not equivalent.

          • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Cats are natural in many parts of the world.

            The Scottish wild cat for instance came to the UK across a land bridge 9000 years ago.

            This thread is full of people that have probably never left America, regurgitating virtue signalling nonsense that they know very little about.

            I understand that in some ecosystems that pet cats are devastating, but it’s just not true for most of the world.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    My cat’s quality of life was dogshit indoors. She had bad allergic reactions all the time, would stop eating, Vet bills piled up with no explanations. I let her roam the neighborhood now, shes happy as a pig in shit. Her weight is stable, shes not breaking out in rashes all the time, and she entertains the neighbors. Cry me a river about all the mice and bunnies she kills.

    • Grayox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      YOU are directly responsible for the extinction of animals. I hope you are proud of yourself.

      “Cats have contributed to the extinction of 63 species of birds, mammals, and reptiles in the wild”

  • willis936@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    A stranger outdoor cat just walked with me for a few blocks on my way home from a dinner party. It was fun to have a five minute feline friend. It’s sad to know they will very likely die long before my indoor cat of a similar age.

      • threeduck@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Wherever there’s birds, it’s irresponsible to let cats out. NZ in particular, it’s a damn massacre out there.

        • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          In the UK, the RSPB determines no negative impacts on bird populations. And the ecosystem is irrecoverably damaged from 3000 years of human impact on a relatively small island. Unlike new colonies like NZ, USA etc.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            The UK is losing its wildcat population because of british arrogance about cats.

            Youre also bringing in all your local predators into human settlements with the free food that cats become. Foxes love outdoor cats, theyre easy meals. You know what else loves cats? Tires. Smears a cat like jam.

            But whats another destroyed ecosystem to the brits? Yall love ruining ecosystems, may as well fill your own backyard with piss.

            • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The wildcats are in Northern Scotland. I’d be OK with the Scots banning outdoor cats.

              Foxes like bins, they don’t fight back.

              I’ve seen maybe 1 domestic cat hit by a car, I’ve seen hundreds of hedgehogs, foxes, badgers and deer. That’s not an outdoor cat problem.

              It’s easy to sit on a moral high horse about a country you don’t really know anything about. We didn’t come to this land 300 years ago. The concept of an intact ecosystem vanished about 1000 years ago. It is a completely different island. The best we can do is keep the last of our wild species ticking over.

              Unlike the Americans, who exploited and continue to exploit one of the most beautiful lands in the world, when they should have known better.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                The wildcats are now surviving in northern scotland. That was not their original range.

                Your lot thought a serial killer was on a cat mutilation spree, for 4 years, only to find out it was a fox that wasnt hiding its kills. So… No, sorry, you dont actually seem to know the country you live in very well. Foxes eat cats like candy, they just prefer to hide while they eat.

                But Im glad cat deaths only count when you see them, Im sure you cover your eyes often.

                “Unlike the americans.” Lol, ok bud. Because I know from actual formerly british researchers that you take care of your ecosystem as well as well as you take care of your relationship with the mainland.

        • jpeps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          In countries where cats are native, they have significantly less impact on wildlife, or at the very least form a part of an ecosystem rather than being a manual introduction (admittedly one complication here is cat populations grouping up in suburban areas). As for safety for the cats, in their native countries they don’t have any serious predators to harm them.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I don’t know if Finland is considered native for cats but it’s against the law to let cats roam freely because there’s a very real risk of them getting injured, disease or dying. Not just from predators but from humans and cars and so on. A dead cat on the side of the road is a too common of a sight. I think the effect on wildlife is seen as secondary and the welfare of the cat is the foremost reason for it.

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I live in the UK where there are an estimated 10.8 million cats and have literally never seen “a dead cat on the side of the road”. I appreciate that it is a real risk and that it does happen, but you’re either blowing things out of proportion or there is something weird going on with Finnish cats and or Finnish drivers.

                • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  230,000÷10,800,000÷4x100%≈0.5%

                  If I had to personally take that risk or stay in the house for the rest of my life. I’d choose freedom every time.

                  What’s really more selfish and entitled? Imprisoning an animal for life in return for an increased 0.5% of safety or letting it makes its own choice?

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The danger isn’t to the cats, it’s to everything else. Ecologically speaking, cats are an invasive apex predator. They absolutely wreak havoc on local bird populations.

          • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Not in the wild, but in a suburban neighborhood they are. Apex is relative to what else is out there.

            • trolske@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              They are still mesopredators. A big bird of prey, a coyote, or a fox wouldn’t mind going for a cat.
              But it’s not even relevant for the discussion whether they are apex predators or not. They are efficient predators and the artificial high number of individuals is harmful for the ecosystem.

      • UserFlairOptional@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Cats survived before us by hunting small mammals and small birds, and they are very effective at getting fed.

        The motivation at the core of naming owners of outdoor cats as irresponsible is a sharp decline in songbird populations in direct proportion to the increase in outdoor cat population.

    • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re uninformed. Cats co-evolved with humans to serve a job (pest control, in exchange for safety and the occasional bit of food). There have only been fully indoor cats for a few hundred years. Not all cats have to have a job, but some WANT one, just like dogs. We should let them.

      My cat is angry with me if I don’t let him spend at least 12 hours a day roaming and catching bugs and mice. He has neighbor cat friends that he goes to see. Why would I deprive him of that?

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Your cat is your property. Keep it in your property. If your pet becomes my pest, it will be dealt with as such. I once had a neighbor’s cat almost rip through my window screen to get inside and go after my pet parrot. If the cat had made it inside, he would not have made it out alive.

        Then I could return it’s corpse to you, and you can tell me all about how they evolved alongside humans, and how that means you’re entitled to let your pet fuck up my yard, home and pets

            • shottymcb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              If your pet bird is being attacked by a cat, by all means, do what you have to. Daydreaming about murdering cats because they’re scratching at your window is some sick shit, though.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think we have different definitions of irresponsible or entitled behavior if you think giving the cat what it wants or otherwise doing whatever our selfish uninformed ancestors did is the correct option.

        You should deprive your invasive manmade predator the option to kill local wildlife for sport because the local ecosystem takes irreparable damage every time a species goes extinct due to human incompetence. Cats naturally belonged to a small region of northern Africa and the Mediterranean before humans spread them across the entire earth and let their population boom from hundreds to hundreds of millions.

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ah yes, those damned educated people making choices that are beneficial to themselves and others. NEEEEEEERRRRRRRDDDSSSSS~!!!

            • fosho@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              after finding it quite surprising that folks here feel so strongly about forcing such a depressing life on highly independent creatures, I decided to look for the evidence myself.

              sure enough, it’s not as clear as you all think. one of the problems with the research is that it is incorrectly applied to all environments without merit. and the biggest issue of all is that most of the problem is caused by feral cats.

              so no, your absolute position that all cats must be indoors only is not fully supported by evidence. furthermore it is alarming how quick people are to impose their beliefs on other creatures with only a small amount of reason.

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                If you don’t enforce indoor only cats with high precision then feral cats exist everywhere as a result.

                Literally no environment benefits from thousands of fucking cats.

                You will look for any excuse to avoid the guilt of our failures as a species.

                • fosho@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  owning pets isn’t about maximizing environmental benefits. your own existence is a much larger problem for that but no one is telling you to live your entire life in a boring box because we have too many humans. this hill is not important enough to warrant all you folks dying on it.

      • Grayox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “Outdoor domestic cats are a recognized threat to global biodiversity. Cats have contributed to the extinction of 63 species of birds, mammals, and reptiles in the wild”

        You shouldn’t be proud of contributing to the extinction of animals…

  • Boingboing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Live in Sweden and have 3 cats. Two are outdoor cats and one wanted to be an outdoor cat but he kinda realised he is fat and lazy and wants to stay home. So this felt very accurate for the cats who live with me!

    Oh and in Sweden all cats are tagged and registered in case any should go missing. I could not imagine a world where I would deny my cats the right to go outside. Then again I did move to the countryside just so my cats could have a better life far away from traffic.

      • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think humans far outweigh the cats in the scale for harm done to animal populations on this earth.

        Are we gonna really start policing whether or not people let their cats out over some dumb birds?

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          The damage done by cats is part of the human related harm. The cats did not relocate of their own volition. We put them there.

          If you think any animal small enough to fit in a cats mouth is “some dumb bird,” then I gotta say Mr. Random Dumb Ape, you sound like you would lose an intelligence test to the bird

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Cats ranking on a nonexistent list of “”“most invasive”“” doesnt matter.

                  Cats degree of invasion is directly controlled by humans. They are, arguably, an extention of us outside of their native ranges.

                  Reducing the impact of cat damage is a direct reduction of human damage. Because the cat was only able to do any damage at all because you let it go outside unsupervised.

  • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Shame on everyone in this thread that wants to have an argument about indoor v outdoor cats. 99 problems this isn’t one we need to pull out the torches for.

    • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve seen the stats on cats v birds, but I live in the country and there are feral and outdoor cats galore. I’ve literally never seen one even noticing birds except to chatter lazily at them.

      But in every field there is at least one cat sitting patiently over a gopher/rodent hole waiting. Sometimes once they catch a rodent, a raven will come screaming down on them and they drop their snack and run away while the raven flies off with it.

      Ravens on the other hand, love nothing more than fledgling song birds and eggs.