• Kakaofruchttafel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean they’ve also consistently been making YouTube worse for everyone not using Adblock, so it’s only fair.

    • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sounds like its beginning to reach the point someone may decide to code an add-on or extension that adds a “F*** YouTube” button to a Youtube Video page where if you click that button, it would take you over to the equivalent YewTu.be page of the video currently being viewed.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Long time family premium user (household of parents and kids). Anything Youtube do to preserve their revenue within reason doesn’t bother me too much as long as they don’t reduce the split with quality creators. If they were successful with all this bullshit perhaps they wouldn’t have needed to notify me that subs are almost doubling next year. My guess is all they are doing is fucking things up for everyone. It is only going to get worse if their premium subscription base reduces. They should be pricing premium as an alternative to ad-blockers but instead they are pushing people including premium subscribers towards ad-blockers.

    I already have ad-blockers and apps for circumventing youtube ads. Not using them in favour of a fairly priced (to me) subscription was a choice but sadly one Google seems to be discouraging.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve also felt like YouTube Premium was a pretty good deal, given the sheer amount of YouTube content I consume and how much I detest ads.

      That said, I also feel like most of what I really value from YouTube is on Nebula, to which I am also subscribed. I constantly wonder if it would be worth it to drop YouTube altogether, to save some money but also a huge amount of time.

      The only other thing really keeping me on YouTube Premium is the included YouTube music. Not like Spotify is much cheaper, and I’m not much into manually managing libraries of my own music files like I did in the days of my 2nd Gen iPod (it had a touch wheel!).

  • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    However bad they may make it, it can’t possibly be worse than it is for non-adblock users.

    But hey, if they want to torpedo their own services, have at it. It’s not like they have a reputation for it or anything…

  • Cagi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Remember when every billionaire apologist was telling us how no one would do shit like this when net neutrality was being gutted?

    • yiliu@informis.land
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This has nothing to do with net neutrality. Google is not an ISP. With or without net neutrality, Google could fuck with YouTube users.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not just YouTube. Now I have to say I’m not a robot when searching from my phone because I dare use a VPN that’s not theirs.

        • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Do you know the old saying:
          if privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy.

          Just because people might do stuff with things that isn’t intended or even illegal doesn’t mean you should be banning said things.
          Otherwise we’d be in a world where we have no kitchen knives, axes, wrenches, food, money, cars, planes, ships, bikes, hands, feet - you know what I mean?

  • RT Redréovič@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is a good time to make aware about an amazing privacy-centric & user-friendly alternative - Peertube. It is not a big network as of now but the benefits it provides over YouTube are large - it is a part of the fediverse. Of course, only through increasing participation will the network become bigger.

    If you still wish to use YouTube, you can try third party front ends like Invidious or Piped on the browser; NewPipe(Also is a front end for Soundcloud, media.ccc.de, Peertube & Bandcamp) or LibreTube on Android.

    If you only browse YT Music, you can try HyperPipe in the browser. There are many apps for it available on F-Droid, an alternative app store for Android. My personal pick is ViMusic.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Peertube is a great platform. And it has its uses. But it will never compete with YouTube - YouTube’s business model actively incentivises and pays people to post media to their platform.

      Peertube is more likely to be to be the opposite - donation run, and given videos are exponentially more expensive to host, it’s highly unlikely that creators will receive any compensation for their work. In fact it’s more likely theyl be in the list of people donating to the platform (or they’ll own the platform outright)

      While this might be fine if a creator makes the majority of its money elsewhere, via patreon or sponsors or whatever, it’s not going to work out for any aspiring or up and coming YouTube who has yet to become big enough to start diversifying their income base.

    • megrania@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I feel like people mistake YouTube for a video hosting solution.

      But that’s not the point.

      • YouTube a huge archive of content that accumulated over the past 17 years.
      • YouTube is a content suggestion machine. Discoverability is a key aspect.
      • YouTube sets an incentive by allowing people to monetize their content.

      So, if the only thing you’re looking for is a video hosting solution, then, yes, PeerTube might be an alternative. In the same way uploading videos to your own webspace would be, and Vimeo also still exists.

      But for all the other stuff, YT is, unfortunately, unmatched, and probably will be for a while …

  • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have LIbreWolf with uBlock Origin and NoScript (and Redirector I can turn on to redirect me from watching videos on YouTube.com to YewTu.be on a moments notice of something funky going on with YouTube), and so far, I have not noticed any ads or anything for a long time. I’m probably at the point of beginning to wonder what a YouTube Ad is.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It doesn’t seem to be working for me. I’ve never been blocked for using ad blockers. It’s still the same speed it’s always been. I have all these work arounds just waiting to be used that I haven’t even had to actually try.

    Are they only doing this shit to like 12 people who write articles about it? Why wouldn’t it be globally done all at once for everyone?

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sure if you consider captcha to be a punishment. Poor baby.

    I use VPNs but I’m not going to be a slave or a fanboy to avoiding facts and reality.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    As a Premium user who still had uBlock installed, I was noticing the other day a loading problem when I had it activated until I deactivated and reloaded. Still, Google is entirely within it’s right to target people even according to one of its greatest critics: https://youtu.be/KMLMQRS3Krk?t=175

        • Gladaed@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          To discern if an add blocker is in use you are processing information not essential to your service.

          You could, eg. Not start the stream until the add is over if it wasn’t blocked without violating this. In the end whether or not the user uses an add blocker is not relevant to your ability to stream a video.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          IIRC it was one lower court case in Germany… That’s so many asterisk attached as to be meaningless, even if that judgement isn’t struck down or amended (unlikely), that still only applies to Germany (or was it one state within Germany?).

          The way the EU works is that it mandates each sovereign country to implement the mandate into their national laws, so jurisprudence in Germany doesn’t mean anything at all anywhere else.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t know why they think this change is going to get anyone to switch.

    5 seconds of nothing is still way better than a minute-long ad

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      They want to sell their Premium subscription. They want you to compare 5 seconds of nothing versus “0” seconds of nothing. That being said, I think uBlock Origin with up-to-date filter lists completely eliminated this delay for me.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        uBlock Origin

        I still worry that google is going to declare ad blockers against their TOS and shut down my gdrive and 20 year old gmail. I’m trying to move away from alphabet shit but it’s not so easy with such a long history. To that end I haven’t even once used yt except not logged in on a FF private window with ublock since they started pulling this shit.

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        They can try selling me their Premium subscription again when they start suggesting more than one or two videos (if that) on their homepage that actually interest me.

        Not that I’ll ever pay for it, anyway. But get me something that I’ll actually click on to get served ads before trying to sell me something to get rid of them.