• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Been riding in America for decades. There is risk, but it’s still a lot lower than the risk associated with inactivity. Ride, and ask local government for infrastructure change

      • neanderthal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe. It really depends on your location. Biking on the only road out of my neighborhood would be all but suicide because there is no shoulder, it is high traffic, and places without enough forward visibility for cars to react in some places. It isn’t due to lack of demand. I see plenty of people on bicycles in areas where it is reasonably safe to do som In other places I have lived, I agree with you.

        I really hate blanket generalizations like:

        There is risk, but it’s still a lot lower than the risk associated with inactivity.

        That also assumes that the person is inactive otherwise. Some people make an effort to exercise, others have physically demanding jobs. It also assumes the level of risk where it will vary quite a bit depending on location.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Statistically most motorcycle accidents are caused by the rider.

      • toothpicks@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Commenter didn’t specify motorcycle, sounds like they were talking about guilt l bicycle. Do you have a source for your claim?

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I assumed moto due to the article photo.

          Cant remember the source atm but i cited it elsewhere not very long ago.

          I might update this later with a source but probably not because I’m lazy.