• The_Worst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Payment providers should not be able to control what users are or are not allowed to purchase with their cards. It’s a downward spiral. Electronic payment is a necessity in nowadays life.

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as it’s a legal transaction, the providers should STFU.

        • Belgdore@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sets a precedent though, and implies that the card companies are responsible for what people buy. First it’s drugs, then it’s porn, liquor, gender affirming items and hormones, contraceptives, or whatever else the fascists don’t like. Companies won’t want to be fined by the fascist right once they start pushing to ban things.

            • Belgdore@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What federal law are they adhering to? Mastercard isn’t buying the drugs they are denying a person access to the funds that that person already owns. Mastercard should be agnostic to what the person uses that money for.

              It sets a precedent that card companies are responsible for what their client’s purchase, and can reject transactions based on what their clients are purchasing, not how much money/credit they have.

              I can go after corporate shitheads and fascists especially when they are holding each other’s cocks.

                • Belgdore@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why should I care what a person is buying? So what if they are buying hitmen or 100 kilos of cocaine? If and when they get caught they will go to prison. It’s not Mastercard’s job to police the system.

          • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You do realize that there are no banks in the United States that will allow marijuana related business to work with them either, right?

            It’s highly illegal under federal law. My business is done business with marijuana related businesses in the past, and they all have to operate with cash and hand only. It’s insane.

            Nothing like carrying a suitcase full of $250,000 in small sequential unmarked bills to the bank you know…

  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Payment processors have a functional monopoly and should not be permitted to refuse or otherwise be punitive to any category of purchase.

  • N00dle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is lame. Mastercard telling people what not to by is outrageous but not the first time they’ve done this.

  • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think I’m going to make it a goal to stop using these companies. I think credit cards should be banned as predatory actually, or at least heavily restricted.

    • A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      These aren’t credit cards, but debit cards. It’s access to money you have already earned, is in the bank, you own, and Mastercard is saying you can’t spend it on a particular thing. You get around this by doing an ATM cash withdrawal, but it’s still an extra step, and it’s still a megacorp restricting your access to something that the law does not.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This was a maneuver by VISA and MC in the Aughts when Wikileaks was publishing information embarrassing to the US Federal Government.

    Pharmacies and medical doctors have long been creative about preserving privacy. Dispensaries will go back to selling tea or candy or miscellaneous OTC pharmacological product which they’ve been doing since prohibition if not before.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Under the law, they literally have to limit transactions for illegal goods, otherwise they become complicit in that crime.

        The real stupidity is that Marijuana is still illegal under federal law.

  • MdRuckus @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, they can’t stop a cash withdrawal on your card to pay for it. So, it appears they still have to pay for it in a way.