• jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Zoom: “wE cAnT cOlAbOrAtE iF wErE nOt In PeRsOn. We NeEd EmPloYeEs To ReTuRn tO tHe OfFiCe.”

    They have stiff competition but this has to be one of the most incompetent boners I have ever seen pulled by a major corporation. Stating very clearly to the entire world that you have no confidence in your own product. If Eric Yuan (Zoom’s CEO) wasn’t the principle shareholder he probably would have been fired out of a cannon by now.

    • llama@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And what are zoom employees using from the office to sell their product? Why no other than a fine Zoom call, from our desk to yours!

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Decentralize. Democratize. Demonetize. Time for a new internet, a new gaming industry, and a way of sharing thoughts and ideas where clout is the least important factor.

  • TiredNerdDad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a turning point and I’m here for it

    Twitter, Reddit, Facebook => Fediverse

    Unity => Godot

    AAA Studios => Indie devs

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally every company is doing this. There was a time when, for example, Apple could reverse engineer the Word document format and make their own word processor that uses them. This was very common and resulted in things like IBM PC clones that sped up innovation.

    Now companies use litigation and corporate buyouts to reduce their competition, then set up ways to extract rents on customers rather than providing a service. Business folks love this because it means a consistent stream of revenue that won’t go away. And now you’ve got carmakers looking to charge by the month for features.

    For more details, read Chokepoint Capitalism.

    • tuxrandom@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And now you’ve got carmakers looking to charge by the month for features.

      When I reach the point at which I am forced to buy a car like that, I’d just find out from where the feature gets controlled and hack in my own controller and a good 'ol switch.

      • ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right now it’s your right to do what you want to your car as long as it still passes vehicle inspection, but it appears that car makers want new laws that prevent you from modifying your own car.

        If we just sit on our hands now, well likely move into a future where we will be forced to either pay subscription or take public transit, which requires subscriptions.

        • tvarog_smetana@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Library of Congress added “software that runs land vehicles” to their copyright exceptions somewhat recently. That’s why farmers are legally allowed to use cracked software from Ukrainian grain farmers to run/repair their tractors

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Microsoft. They’ve been itching to go to a fully cloud-dependent subscription-only model for Windows for a while now.

      • GreenMario@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah then MacOS 11 came out after 20 years. The idea was to have the same version number for the dumb dumbs. It’s why the Xbox 2 was called Xbox 360 so it’d match PlayStation 3, but bigger.

        • far_university1990@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Firefox did the same bullshit. Was on version 5 for ages, saw chrome do insane version numbers, „oh no they might think we are outdated“. Now firefox v110.

          What a pile of shit

          • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            LOL why do you care what version number it is? They could switch to using letters, I wouldn’t give a shit.

            The part that’s cool is rolling updates. It just doesn’t make sense to have a release schedule like they did. The reason why software had that in the first place was for marketing: you’re supposed to get excited for the new version 6.0 or whatever and run down to the computer store and buy it to replace your old, outdated version 5.0. That model doesn’t make sense for software that’s free, though. Incremental updates make more sense. Features get rolled out gradually instead of being all bundled together for a big, splashy upgrade.

            • far_university1990@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I do not care about the version numbers, i care about „oh no, chrome is doing something, quick we need to adjust or we will be laughed upon“.

              Copying chrome is the pile of shit.

              Rolling updates makes sense, i agree with that.

      • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        the surprising thing there isn’t that they went back on their word, but that they said it in the first place.

        Seriously, how could an OS company seriously believe they’d never need or want to release a new major version

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was to keep everyone in their eco system and just update it as they found more ways to extract revenue

          • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right but they could have done that without promising that 10 would be the last Windows version. Let’s be honest, everyone is already locked into their ecosystem outside of enthusiasts and people with Apple Hardware. If you want a non-mac laptop/desktop, unless you go well out of your way, you’re almost certain to end up with a Windows PC, they didn’t need the “last version” gimmick to keep people on Windows.

            Hell, a lot of non-techy people who are already used to using Windows would rather not use a computer than learn to use a new OS. It’s easy to forget how tech illiterate the average person is

            • idiomaddict@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m probably one of the less technically literate people here and in my case, you’re absolutely right. I assume Linux involves typing commands somewhere and I, frankly, have to look up how to do a vlookup in excel every time it happens.

              I would probably prefer to use my phone (an old ass iPhone) instead of a computer with a totally new os. I’m not a huge fan of macs, but it’s still basically the same on the user end. I suspect linux is more different.

              Inb4: I straight up don’t have time to switch my os for at least a year, I just wanted to support the above comment. I am well aware that my assumptions are probably wrong, just wanted to share what the reputation of Linux is among non tech people (if they’ve ever even heard of it).

              • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You should read up the Halloween documents to get a better understanding of where some of those assumptions (which to be fair have since become something of a self fulfilling prophecy…) originate from.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Some people stay on previous versions though and that means less of a base to send advertisements to

              It’s not a worry of people going to Linux, it’s a worry of people staying on 10 instead of going to 11

              • CaptKoala@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                As a lifelong windows user, 10 is my last windows, I’ve heard nothing but garbage from those I know running win11.

                I will be switching, it’s just a matter of distros, better support for gaming/vr/drivers etc.

                I’ve been messing around with Ubuntu on an Orange Pi 5 and so far, apart from gnome (even with extensions) I’m really pleased and feel much more in control of my hardware.

                The moment I heard of ads in the start menu on 11 I vowed it won’t happen, and yet the bing bar showed up on my desktop last week after am update. Needless to say I’ve already been into the registry to fix that issue, but yes, that basically sums up how I feel, and I know most I know feel the same re: MS Windows at this point.

  • Dame @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately and admittedly, we are the problem. These companies know that people pay for convenience and stick to what they know. If we were less likely to do so companies would have to raise their standards. Take Twitter for example, even with Musks over inflated numbers other sources indicate there’s still hundreds of millions of Twitter users. They see all of the things Musk has done and it hasn’t buried his business thus they are now taking pages out of his book.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Blaming individuals for not performing collective consumerist acts against corporations is liberal bullshit that only excuses corporate wrongdoing.

      EDIT: To spare other people from having to read the smug corpo clown buffoonery beneath this post, I’ll put the most relevant part I wanted to stress up here instead:

      The eight hour day, the end of widescale child labor, the concept of minimum wage, and much more that improved the lot of the working class and of society as a whole were not the products of “vote with your wallet” nonsense. Slavery wasn’t abolished in the United States (it still isnt if you count the prison system, and you should, but stay with me here) by cotton buyers coming together to only buy “ethical” cotton.

      • Dame @lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not liberal bs. It’s lazy thinking on your part and people are agreeing with you to shuck accountability. None of the services are essential services. We could easily drop them and it have nearly zero material impact on our lives. Spare me the BS. Just say you’re too lazy to pull away from comfort. People vote with their dollars all of the time. It’s also not liberal, there’s been conservative stances against businesses and corporations as well. As humans some of the biggest influences we have in society is our votes and our dollars. Quit being lazy and just state you’re fine with things as long as it doesn’t disrupt your comforts. That’s better than calling it “liberal”

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not liberal bs

          It is.

          It’s lazy thinking on your part

          No, blaming individuals for not coming together in some magical way and putting all the responsibility on them for what corporations do is your lazy thinking. Next you’ll say that blood diamonds are entirely the fault of people buying them and not the DeBeers corporation enforcing artificial scarcity with them while performing atrocities at the same time, with the implication that atrocities just happen until a magical moment that people stop buying the artificially scarce diamonds, and because that is materialistically highly unlikely in the present system, that just allows smuglords like you to shame the masses while at the same time feeling idealistically superior to them while doing nothing.

          We

          Stop saying “we.” You are licking the boot and blaming the masses for not being as enlightened as you so you can feel superior to them.

          Quit being lazy

          Quit being a smug liberal bootlicker. smuglord farquaad-point

          • Dame @lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not liberal then what do you call conservatives that make the same decisions? You’re just weak. I love how you gloss over the protections of your comforts. It’s not lazy thinking to hold businesses and government accountable. How tf do you think we do that? People have protested, use their votes and used their dollars. YOU are the lazy one. I’m glad we live in a different world because people and those that agree with you would still have us in the slave days and civil rights wouldn’t be fought for at all. You do understand it was peoples protests, voting and their dollars that forced many of the major movements of the world right? Not people just waiting for businesses and governments to magically do the right thing. Having people ban together despite their comforts is not magical nor lazy. You are just weird.

    • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just think people shouldn’t be chided for doing what is convenient when so much of our economy is attention based. Kind of like hating the players instead of the game.

  • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Companies can no longer continue to grow through innovating their products or services. Companies are no longer competing in that domain because they have already conquered it completely.

    Companies can no longer grow through marketing and branding. Branding is everything and everywhere now, even normal people have personal brands, they have already conquered that domain and most people have grown to disdain marketing and branding so its less effective than ever.

    Companies can no longer grow through data collection and advertising. All data is collected, ads are everywhere and they are always listening to everything we say and do. They have already conquered that domain.

    Now all that’s left is competition through exploitation. It’s the only way companies can continue to grow. That is the stage of capitalism we are entering.

  • IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank you for poating more examples of capitalism being an absolutely miserable and abject failure at everything it claimed to do.

    The entire concept of “projected growth” and “company valuations” is the opposite of a market. Extraction of value is the opposite of creation of value… And stocks have repeatedly shown themselves to be entirely unrelated to the health if the company or value of it’s products…if there even is an actual product.

    • lazyraccoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the moon monkeys and GameStop showed, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that modern stock markets have absolutely nothing to do with raising capital to support entrepreneurship.

      It’s just a big casino, rigged so the house wins, and the only way to win is cheat the house using it’s own rules.

  • F04118F@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Red Hat (Enrerprise Linux) & HashiCorp (Terraform) closed the source of their products in different ways, also fucking over their community of clients and contributors, though their reasoning seems slightly more sane than “no more free money, aaargh!”

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Short term gains … and gain them as fast as possible … because the end is coming near and everything is going to be over soon.