My pixiv lewdness score (yes, I totally made that up) is 9, because 9 of the first 18 images from users I’m following would probably violate Burggit rules.
To calculate your lewdness score:
- Go to https://www.pixiv.net/bookmark_new_illust.php
- Of the first 18 images, how many of them violate the Burggit rules? Use your best judgment.
I don’t go on Pixiv, but my fanbox account is pretty lewd, though nothing on there even comes close to violating Burggit rules. So, I’m probably playing with a very different set of criteria for “lewd” than you are. xD
Seems to be realistic loli AI art based on looking up the artist JapanCSK. I don’t think it’s a general rule that it’s banned, but it’s not allowed on the !lewd_ai community
I took this thread to mean that, if a child looks real at first glance, that this rule applies, even if it’s AI art:
No content involving junior idols, child models, or anyone under the age of 18 in revealing clothing, questionable poses, or questionable situations
Perhaps I’m mistaken in that. How do you read it?
EDIT: For a JapanCSK example, I’d consider the images on this page to have revealing clothing and questionable poses (CW: no explicit nudity, but still NSFW): https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/109427413
if a child looks real at first glance, that this rule applies, even if it’s AI art:
You are correct.
Most newcomers probably won’t know about that thread or the “first glance” criteria that came out of it. Would it be worth clarifying on the sidebar?
EDIT: What I linked above was a partial thread, here’s the full thread: https://burggit.moe/comment/54954
Yeah, was thinking about that. I adjusted the sidebar, let me know if it gets the message across properly.
Makes sense to me.
Well 22 out of 48 are 3d murder so I’d say around the same level.
Uhhh. I can explain
Go on, it’s kinda funny to me lol.
