Today I opened the App Store on my GrapheneOS to see, that Accrescent is now mirrored in it.

I know, that GrapheneOS devs have addressed F-droid very negatively it the past (and they still do that), but imo, including Accrescent as a part of official GOS App Store is very harmful for FLOSS movement, as Accrescent does not support any third-party repos, claiming that they are “breaking the Android security model”, and also allows submitting closed-source apps to the repo.

This unlikely to be the reason for me to change OS, as GrapheneOS is still amazing, but devs rhetoric and actions become more and more concerning for me.

  • Barx [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    GrapheneOS has an approach that always prioritizes security at a technical level over privacy over promoting FLOSS. I think the first two are difficult to balance as they are interrelated but sometimes come at the cost of one another. I think the second is reasonable to have below the first two given the state of app ecosystems in general.

    F-Droid does need to improve its approach to security. I can see why projects don’t promote it as a default.

    • JustMarkov@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      F-Droid does need to improve its approach to security. I can see why projects don’t promote it as a default.

      I agree, F-droid hat its problems that have to be solved, but still, F-droid needs help, not a replacement.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        No one said anything about a misconception. That’s a nice piece of propaganda there. Another reason Linux will never proliferate. Because they don’t want it to.

        • JustMarkov@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s a nice piece of propaganda there.

          Accrescent devs claims about closed-source software and third party repos isn’t a propaganda?